i was sending the law career convention proposal to some law firms, and *ahem* browsing through blogs at the same time *multi-tasking is not a sin* and guess what.
don't know which blog la tetiba keluar music wan.
AND I WAS IN THE LIBRARY. still am.
*smacks forehead*
lesson learned: do not read blogs in the library.
on another note, i'm wondering if i should drive back to malacca on thursday, after my tutorial ends at 5pm, or on friday morning. why the predicament?
because i heard on the radio last week that "there is to be no driving on the 18 & 19 of september".
huh?
on a third note, i read this on yen's blog: "two incidents happened that reminded me of tse hwei". i was like, bangga siot. then guess what.
she equated me with su-eh.
-_-!
on a fourth note, dr johan called names today - some of those who were absent on monday - and said to write a show-cause letter explaining our absence. if he isn't satisfied with our answer, he'll make us do an assignment.
har-di-har-har.
i was upset at first, because i knew, and i knew that he knew, that there were more than just those who were called. and we're being 'punished' for being honest.
but then i realized that i'd committed a wrong by not attending in the first place, so i have to be punished anyway. and just as we do the right thing regardless of whether other people do the same, we must be punished for a wrong regardless of whether other people are punished for the same wrong.
in any case, i'm relieved that i'm finally being punished, because in some way, i hope this can rectify that wrong.
but i obviously don't have a good reason for not going. bah.
wilber, john and i sat down to write our letters together.
don't know which blog la tetiba keluar music wan.
AND I WAS IN THE LIBRARY. still am.
*smacks forehead*
lesson learned: do not read blogs in the library.
on another note, i'm wondering if i should drive back to malacca on thursday, after my tutorial ends at 5pm, or on friday morning. why the predicament?
because i heard on the radio last week that "there is to be no driving on the 18 & 19 of september".
huh?
on a third note, i read this on yen's blog: "two incidents happened that reminded me of tse hwei". i was like, bangga siot. then guess what.
she equated me with su-eh.
-_-!
on a fourth note, dr johan called names today - some of those who were absent on monday - and said to write a show-cause letter explaining our absence. if he isn't satisfied with our answer, he'll make us do an assignment.
har-di-har-har.
i was upset at first, because i knew, and i knew that he knew, that there were more than just those who were called. and we're being 'punished' for being honest.
but then i realized that i'd committed a wrong by not attending in the first place, so i have to be punished anyway. and just as we do the right thing regardless of whether other people do the same, we must be punished for a wrong regardless of whether other people are punished for the same wrong.
in any case, i'm relieved that i'm finally being punished, because in some way, i hope this can rectify that wrong.
but i obviously don't have a good reason for not going. bah.
wilber, john and i sat down to write our letters together.
wilber's hands.john calls this: "three remorseful people writing show-cause letter".
3 comments:
geez, even your rantings sounded like a lawyer.
keep your laptop on silent mode in the library.
[Teck Wei] Where got. Ceh.
[Kee Aun] Was using library's computer actually. Ahaha.
Post a Comment